ProvidenceWatch
home  
contact us  
tell a friend  
In-depth reporting on Providence Health & Services - independent of company management

 


You watch Providence
 
» Join our mailing list
» Tell your Providence story

 
 
Latest News

ProvidenceWatch Exclusive:
October 25, 2006

Providence settles lawsuit alleging overcharging the uninsured

UPDATE: Despite Providence's settlement in Oregon, allegations of discriminatory billing practices to the uninsured have recently turned up in one of its Alaska hospitals, where a lawsuit was filed on August 16. According to the suit, Providence "has breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing to plaintiffs and the class by utilizing aggressive, abusive and harassing collection practices such as collection lawsuits, liens and garnishments to collect outstanding grossly inflated medical debt."
Oregon's two largest non-profit health systems, Providence Health System (now part of Providence Health & Services) and Legacy Health System, have recently settled class action lawsuits regarding their treatment of uninsured patients.

Though filed separately, the legal complaints alleged the two systems billed uninsured patients higher "gross charges," or sticker prices, while they charged discounted rates to patients with insurance. According to the plaintiffs in the case, this practice effectively discriminates against the uninsured, while privileging insurance companies that negotiate lower rates for members.

Download Providence Oregon's Charity Care Settlement
In the settlement agreements, both companies agreed to provide refunds or bill reductions to uninsured patients if they paid more for services than they would if they were insured. Both systems have also agreed to improve their charity care policies for future patients, although the settlements set out different terms for those improvements. Providence places a tighter restriction on who can qualify for the discounts. For a comprehensive settlement comparison, click here.

The terms of the settlement apply to Providence's seven Oregon hospitals and three of Legacy's hospitals. The Legacy settlement does not explicitly involve a fourth Legacy hospital in Oregon. While Providence's final settlement agreement was approved in June, Legacy's settlement has only been preliminarily approved . It is expected to be finally approved in March 2007.

Uninsured Patients to Receive Retroactive Discounts

One of the most significant concessions in both lawsuits appears to be the retroactive discounts the companies will apply to uninsured patient bills dating back to December 2001. The refunds or bill reductions patients receive will be calculated from the respective hospital's gross charges for services rendered.

The Legacy settlement offers better protection for small claimants, as Providence will not provide refunds to patients who they charged $500 or less, unless the aggregate bill was greater than $1500. Legacy does not impose a similar restriction.

Providence's retrospective discount is 31.6% for care received at its Portland-area hospitals, 10.8% at its other hospitals in the state, and Legacy's discount is 25%. The value of these discounts cannot be measured merely by percentage discounts since different hospitals offer different charges for the same service. ProvidenceWatch calculated the before-and-after refund prices for the five most common services affecting uninsured patients in Oregon. The results show that Providence hospitals charged the highest prices, both before and after uninsured discounts, for each of the five services. See the comparison chart.

According to a Providence press release, the company will refund or adjust an estimated $1 million in past bills. It did not reveal what it anticipates future discounts will cost the company. An anticipated amount for Legacy's retroactive or future discounts is likewise unavailable, although one press account suggested their entire settlement will cost the system more than $1 million.

Both Systems to Provide Future Discounts to Poor and Uninsured

Legacy and Providence also agreed to future discounts for uninsured patients, though there are some key differences in each's policy. Legacy will provide a 15% discount to its uninsured patients. The discount will extend to 2010 for patients who qualify for charity care and 2008 for patients who do not qualify for charity care, and whose household income is below $100,000.

The Providence prospective discount will be equal to the rate it provided their preferred providers in the each hospital. This discount will extend to 2008.

In addition to retroactive or prospective uninsured discounts, patients may qualify for further charity care discounts at Legacy and Providence hospitals if household income is between 200-400% of the federal poverty level. Each system set a sliding scale to determine the percent discount. Legacy's scale offers more tiers than Providence's, and it includes a more generous discount to patients whose household income is 351-400% above poverty level. Whether one policy is more or less favorable for the uninsured cannot be determined.

Charity Care Discount Table for Legacy
Household Income expressed as a % of Federal Poverty Guideline Percent discount
376-40025
351-37530
326-35040
301-32550
276-30060
251-27570
226-25080
201-22590
0-200100
Charity Care Discount Table for Providence
Household Income expressed as a % of Federal Poverty GuidelinePercent discount
351-40010
301-35040
201-30070
0-200100

Providence Statement Suggest Settlement in Best Financial Interest of Health System

Legacy and Providence refused to admit wrongdoing in accepting the terms of the settlement. Legacy's CEO Lee Domanico stated, "While settling this lawsuit was the right thing to do for our patients and our community, we still believe that these lawsuits divert attention from the real issue - how to ensure basic health coverage for all Americans."

Providence's Senior Vice President Greg Van Pelt, however, suggested the settlement was a result of a financial cost-benefit analysis: "Quite frankly, the cost of litigation is so great it was in the patients' best interest and the hospitals' to get this resolved, and this [the settlement] seemed the best way to do that."

Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is leading the way in encouraging nonprofit hospitals to improve their treatment of the poor. "Non-profit doesn't necessarily mean pro-poor patient... They may charge poor, uninsured patients more for the same services than they charge insured patients," stated Sen. Grassley.


home  ::  ProvidenceWatch Exclusives! ::  about providence  ::  patient resources  ::  other important websites
about providencewatch
 ::  tell a friend  ::  privacy policy  ::  contact us
© ProvidenceWatch 2006