![]() |
home contact us tell a friend |
|
ProvidenceWatch Exclusive: Providence settles lawsuit alleging overcharging the uninsured
Though filed separately, the legal complaints alleged the two systems billed uninsured patients higher "gross charges," or sticker prices, while they charged discounted rates to patients with insurance. According to the plaintiffs in the case, this practice effectively discriminates against the uninsured, while privileging insurance companies that negotiate lower rates for members.
The terms of the settlement apply to Providence's seven Oregon hospitals and three of Legacy's hospitals. The Legacy settlement does not explicitly involve a fourth Legacy hospital in Oregon. While Providence's final settlement agreement was approved in June, Legacy's settlement has only been preliminarily approved . It is expected to be finally approved in March 2007.
Uninsured Patients to Receive Retroactive DiscountsOne of the most significant concessions in both lawsuits appears to be the retroactive discounts the companies will apply to uninsured patient bills dating back to December 2001. The refunds or bill reductions patients receive will be calculated from the respective hospital's gross charges for services rendered.The Legacy settlement offers better protection for small claimants, as Providence will not provide refunds to patients who they charged $500 or less, unless the aggregate bill was greater than $1500. Legacy does not impose a similar restriction. Providence's retrospective discount is 31.6% for care received at its Portland-area hospitals, 10.8% at its other hospitals in the state, and Legacy's discount is 25%. The value of these discounts cannot be measured merely by percentage discounts since different hospitals offer different charges for the same service. ProvidenceWatch calculated the before-and-after refund prices for the five most common services affecting uninsured patients in Oregon. The results show that Providence hospitals charged the highest prices, both before and after uninsured discounts, for each of the five services. See the comparison chart.
According to a Providence press release, the company will refund or adjust an estimated $1 million in past bills. It did not reveal what it anticipates future discounts will cost the company. An anticipated amount for Legacy's retroactive or future discounts is likewise unavailable, although one press account suggested their entire settlement will cost the system more than $1 million.
Both Systems to Provide Future Discounts to Poor and UninsuredLegacy and Providence also agreed to future discounts for uninsured patients, though there are some key differences in each's policy. Legacy will provide a 15% discount to its uninsured patients. The discount will extend to 2010 for patients who qualify for charity care and 2008 for patients who do not qualify for charity care, and whose household income is below $100,000.The Providence prospective discount will be equal to the rate it provided their preferred providers in the each hospital. This discount will extend to 2008. In addition to retroactive or prospective uninsured discounts, patients may qualify for further charity care discounts at Legacy and Providence hospitals if household income is between 200-400% of the federal poverty level. Each system set a sliding scale to determine the percent discount. Legacy's scale offers more tiers than Providence's, and it includes a more generous discount to patients whose household income is 351-400% above poverty level. Whether one policy is more or less favorable for the uninsured cannot be determined.
Providence Statement Suggest Settlement in Best Financial Interest of Health SystemLegacy and Providence refused to admit wrongdoing in accepting the terms of the settlement. Legacy's CEO Lee Domanico stated, "While settling this lawsuit was the right thing to do for our patients and our community, we still believe that these lawsuits divert attention from the real issue - how to ensure basic health coverage for all Americans."Providence's Senior Vice President Greg Van Pelt, however, suggested the settlement was a result of a financial cost-benefit analysis: "Quite frankly, the cost of litigation is so great it was in the patients' best interest and the hospitals' to get this resolved, and this [the settlement] seemed the best way to do that." Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is leading the way in encouraging nonprofit hospitals to improve their treatment of the poor. "Non-profit doesn't necessarily mean pro-poor patient... They may charge poor, uninsured patients more for the same services than they charge insured patients," stated Sen. Grassley.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
home :: ProvidenceWatch Exclusives! :: about providence :: patient resources :: other important websites about providencewatch :: tell a friend :: privacy policy :: contact us © ProvidenceWatch 2006 |